Paulo Freire (1927-1997), a Brazilian educationist, is still popular for his revolutionary ideas about adult education, particularly with “critical consciousness”. He is considered a “pedagogue”; the term, according to dictionaries, refers to someone who goes by the book.
He became influential with his seminal book -“The pedagogy of the oppressed” – published in 1970. You can have free access to the book through this link; https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf
He metaphorized the traditional classroom teaching method to the “banking” concept; here, in a traditional classroom, the teacher “deposits” knowledge into the student’s head. The students, in turn, are expected to use it, probably with some adaptations.
Freire criticized that “banking” concept. Instead, he came up with the following ideas.
“Education for liberation”
He theorized that the purpose of education is to “liberate human potential”. He considered that education was only a part of the whole process.
“The purpose of education should be to liberate human potential”.Paulo Freire
Dialogue versus discussion
The meanings of these two words contrast each other. Oscar Graybill and Lois Brown Easton explain, citing Robert Garmston and Bruce Wellman (1999), the difference between the dialogue and discussion as follows;
What is a “dialogue”?
Dialogue engages the participants to gain an understanding of the topic without the “pressure” of arriving at a decision. In a dialogue, we can hear frequently the “why” questions and the phrases such as, “I am wondering”, “I am curious”, “I am interested”, and “what if” etc.
A dialogue may result in action to gain further understanding such as conducting a survey, focus group discussions, interviews, etc.
We can plan a dialogue by giving the topic beforehand and setting ground rules and guidelines for the event. To learn more about this, I recommend reading the post I cited above.
Discussion is a talk with the purpose of arriving at a decision; it may begin with brainstorming ideas and exploring possibilities. However, later the discussants will choose sides, similar to a debate, and attempt to arrive at a decision. It will not build on ideas and frequently mentions one’s opinions and holds on to them.
Praxis is another term used by Freire. It covers two concepts: Organised knowledge and practice. It is a constant interplay between the two. New knowledge creation is a result of this interplay. Teachers only facilitate the co-creation of new knowledge through these constant interactions.
Culture of silence
He relates the problem of this “banking” concept to the “culture of silence”. In other words, the process ensures the maintenance of the status quo and may only result in a very limited form of system improvement. He uses here a very strong language: the method allows the oppressor to continue the oppression onto the oppressed.
So, what exactly was Freire’s prescription?
His prescription for teaching is grounded on “liberation” from oppression; he preaches that education should liberate the learner. How could we do that, according to him?
That is when he brings forward the concept of “critical consciousness”.
To begin with, the teacher should acknowledge that the learner does not attend with an empty bank account.
The learner brings a wealth of ground-level experience and some knowledge into the discussion; it should be respected. After all, they are the ones who are going to use the “new” knowledge in real life. It needs to be merged and adapted. Therefore, they need to be consulted. While I was working at the Health Promotion Bureau, I used to name the “training” sessions for health education officers and other healthcare professionals as “consultative meetings”. And, I made sure that the “class” arrangement was in a circular fashion, not as a traditional classroom. These things matter, in fact, matters a lot. I even explained why I did that.
The above preparations set the ground for the next step; knowledge should be produced during the interaction between the facilitator and the participants. Ideally, it needs to be problem-based learning. During my time I always encouraged the participants to carry out the presentations. They came with their preparations based on the topics that we agreed upon prior to the session. In fact, these were self-reflective encounters promoting “critical consciousness”. It always boosted their self-esteem as well as entered into a dialogue about how we need to meet real-life challenges.
How to design workshops
While I was researching Paulo Freire and his work, I stumbled on this link that describes how to run a workshop based on his concepts;https://www.nasco.coop/sites/default/files/srl/How%20to%20Design%20Successful%20Community%20Workshops.pdf
Paulo’s influence seems to have spread all over the world; several institutions, organizations, and projects have been launched under his name. one of them is here: http://www.freireproject.org/.
In fact, Freire’s critical consciousness is almost similar to the following quote by Lao Tsu (China 700 BC).
Live with them,
Start with what they know,
Build with what they have,
But with the best leaders
When the work is done,
The task accomplished,
The people will say, “We have done this ourselves” –
– Lao Tsu (China 700 BC)from Goodreads